How to use this course
~3 min read · Read this first
This course is for the person who actually carries the caseload — the employment counsellor, job coach, or case manager who has more clients than hours and needs to do right by all of them anyway. It's short on theory and long on what you can do. There's no policy history, no systems diagrams, no homework you'll never finish. Every module ends with one concrete thing to try.
How to get value from it
- Read one module. Most take under ten minutes.
- Do the one thing. Each module ends with a single "try this on Monday" action. Do that one thing with your real caseload.
- Come back in a few days for the next module.
You don't have to read it in order, and you don't have to finish it in one sitting. If you've got a specific problem right now — "I can't give everyone enough time," "I think I'm burning out," "a client's leaving without a job" — open the 🔍 search (top-right) and jump straight to the module that helps.
Where the advice comes from
Everything here is drawn from research in fields that have studied heavy caseloads for decades — vocational rehabilitation, probation, social work, and healthcare. You won't see a wall of citations; this isn't that kind of course. But when you read "the research shows," it's real — these practices come straight from the evidence base in those fields.
Getting around
- The ≡ button (top left) opens the list of modules. Tap any one to jump to it.
- The 🔍 button (top right) lets you type a problem — like "guilt" or "paperwork" — and filters the course down to what helps, highlighting matches in yellow.
Want a quick walkthrough of those? Tap "? Take the navigation tour" at the top of either sidebar.
It's the Load, Not You
~6 min read · Read this when you're feeling underwater
Let's start with the thing nobody says out loud often enough. If your caseload feels impossible — if you end most weeks knowing there were clients you didn't get to, calls you didn't return, plans you didn't follow up on — that is not a sign you're bad at your job. It's a sign the math doesn't work. When the number of clients climbs faster than the number of hours, no amount of being organized, caring, or hard-working closes that gap. You can be excellent and still not get to everyone.
Why this matters before anything else
People who carry heavy caseloads tend to do one of two things with the gap between what's needed and what's possible. Some absorb it as guilt — "I should be doing more" — and burn out. Others go numb to protect themselves, and stop caring as much as they used to. Both are normal responses to an abnormal load, and both are bad for you and your clients. There's a third option, and it's what this whole course is about: stop trying to do everything for everyone, and start deciding — on purpose — where your time does the most good.
What you can and can't control
| Mostly out of your hands | In your hands |
|---|---|
| How many clients you're assigned | How you divide your time among them |
| The funding and the contract targets | What you actually do in each contact |
| The intake flow | How fast you sort a new client |
| The reporting system | How much time your own paperwork takes |
| Whether the team has enough staff | Whether you ask for backup when you need it |
The whole right-hand column is the course. None of it shrinks your caseload. All of it changes how that caseload lands — on your clients, and on you.
Think about it
Not Every Client Needs the Same From You
~7 min read · The one idea that changes everything
Here's the single most important idea in this course, and it's simple: your clients don't all need the same amount of you. Some need intensive, frequent, hands-on support to get anywhere. Some are basically job-ready and need a nudge, a connection, and a check-in. Treating both the same way — giving everyone the same time, the same number of appointments, the same intensity — feels fair. It isn't. It quietly shortchanges the people who need you most.
What the research says (plainly)
Fields that have studied this for decades — probation, vocational rehab, mental health — keep landing on the same finding. When you concentrate your most intensive effort on your highest-need clients, outcomes go up. When you spread the same intensity evenly across everyone, including people who don't need it, outcomes go down. In probation research it's striking: giving intensive supervision to low-risk people sometimes made their outcomes worse than leaving them with a light touch. More service isn't automatically more help.
"Match the intensity of your support to the level of the client's need — and pull intensity back from the clients who don't need it." — the "risk principle," drawn from decades of cross-sector research
Why over-helping backfires
Two reasons. First, every extra hour you spend on a client who didn't need it is an hour stolen from a client who did — and on a heavy caseload, you feel that trade every single week. Second, for some job-ready clients, too much hand-holding actually slows them down: it can build dependence, undercut their own momentum, and send a quiet message that you don't think they can do it. Stepping back is sometimes the help.
This doesn't mean abandoning anyone. Everyone on your caseload gets a service. It means the shape of that service is different depending on need — and you decide that on purpose, not by accident or by who shouts loudest. The next module shows you how to sort your caseload so you can actually do this.
Think about it
Sort Your Caseload Into Tiers
~8 min read · The practical how-to
Module 2 said match your effort to need. This module is how you actually do it: sort your whole caseload into three tiers, then give each tier a different rhythm of contact. It takes about an hour the first time and maybe fifteen minutes a month after that. It's the highest-payoff hour you'll spend on your caseload all year.
The three tiers
| Tier | Who's here | What you give them | Rough share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — High need | Multiple barriers, a lot of support needed, far from job-ready, or in crisis | Frequent, intensive, hands-on contact | ~15–25% |
| Tier 2 — Medium need | Some barriers, making progress with regular support | Regular but lighter contact; check-ins, steady momentum | ~40–60% |
| Tier 3 — Low need | Close to job-ready, self-directed, just need connections and the occasional nudge | Periodic check-ins; lots of self-serve; quick responses when they reach out | ~20–40% |
How to sort (don't overthink it)
Go down your client list and put a 1, 2, or 3 next to each name. Use your gut — you already know who needs more. You're not building a perfect formula; you're making the rough shape of your caseload visible so you can manage it. The percentages above are a sanity check, not a rule: if you've labelled 80% of your caseload "Tier 1," either you have a genuinely brutal caseload (worth raising with your manager — Module 12) or "high need" has quietly come to mean "everyone."
- Tier isn't a judgment of the person. It's a description of how much support they need from you right now. People move between tiers as their situation changes — that's the point.
- Crisis ≠ high need forever. A Tier 2 client in a sudden crisis gets Tier 1 attention this week, then moves back.
- "Easy and pleasant" is not a tier. Don't let likeable, low-need clients drift into your most-seen group just because the meetings feel good.
What changes once you've sorted
Now you can plan. Tier 1 gets protected slots in your week (Module 7). Tier 2 gets a regular but lighter cadence. Tier 3 gets periodic check-ins and quick responses, and you stop feeling guilty about not seeing them more — because the evidence says that's the right call, not a shortcut. The sort turns "I'm drowning in 200 clients" into "I have about 35 who need real intensity, 100 on a steady rhythm, and 65 I keep warm." That's a caseload you can actually run.
Think about it
It's Okay to Do Less for Some Clients
~7 min read · The guilt module
This is the one that's hard — not technically, but emotionally. Once you've sorted your caseload, you have to actually do less for your lower-need clients: fewer appointments, longer gaps, more self-serve. And almost everyone who does this well goes through a stretch of feeling like they're letting people down. Let's deal with that head-on, because the guilt is the main thing that stops people from doing the one move that helps most.
Why it's not what it feels like
It feels like neglect. It's actually triage — the same thing an ER nurse does when they see the heart-attack patient before the sprained ankle. Nobody calls that nurse uncaring. They'd call it the opposite: someone who knows that treating everyone "equally" when resources are tight means the people in real trouble get hurt. On a heavy caseload, every hour is a resource you're allocating whether you admit it or not. Doing it on purpose, by need, is the caring choice — not the cold one.
How to do less without it feeling like dropping someone
- Make it explicit and positive. Don't just quietly stop calling. Tell the client the plan: "You're in a really strong spot, so I'm going to check in every few weeks instead of weekly — and you can reach me anytime in between if something comes up." That's not a brush-off; it's a vote of confidence. There's a script for this in Your Toolkit.
- Leave the door open. A lighter touch isn't a closed case. Make sure low-need clients know exactly how to flag you if their situation changes — and respond fast when they do.
- Give them something to do. Self-serve tools, a job-search routine, a check-in schedule. Lighter contact works when the client has structure to work with between contacts.
Think about it
Make Every Contact Count
~9 min read · When you can't add hours, add quality
If you can't have more contacts, make the ones you have better. This turns out to be one of the most powerful things on a heavy caseload — and it's backed by some of the strongest evidence in the whole field. In probation studies, officers who changed what they did in routine meetings — without changing how many clients they carried — cut their clients' reoffending dramatically. Same caseload. Different contacts. Better outcomes. The lesson for us: the content of a meeting matters more than the count of meetings.
"What gets done in each contact moves outcomes more than how many contacts you have." — drawn from probation and supported-employment research
Six things that make a contact count
You don't need all six every time. But a good contact usually has several of these, and a contact that's just "checking in, how's it going, okay see you next time" usually has none.
- A real relationship moment. Genuine warmth and respect isn't fluff — it's the foundation that makes everything else land. Clients work harder for someone they trust.
- One concrete skill or step. Practise the interview answer, fill in the application together, role-play the call to the employer. Do something, don't just talk about doing it.
- A clear next action the client owns. End every contact with the client knowing exactly what they're doing before you next talk — specific, small, and theirs.
- Reinforce what's working. Name the thing the client did well since last time. Catch them doing it right. It builds momentum better than pointing out what they missed.
- Problem-solve the real barrier. Get under "I didn't apply" to what actually stopped them — transport, childcare, fear, a gap they don't know how to explain — and solve that.
- Model and rehearse. Show them how, then have them try it with you, before they do it for real. Rehearsal in your office beats advice they'll forget by the parking lot.
The most common time-waster
The "status update" meeting — where the client reports what happened and you nod and book the next one — feels productive and mostly isn't. If a contact didn't include practising something, solving something, or committing to a specific next step, ask whether it needed to be a meeting at all. Sometimes that's a two-minute text instead of a half-hour appointment — and that recovered half-hour goes to a Tier 1 client.
Think about it
Quick Triage: The First Meeting & the Last
~8 min read · Two moments that save you the most time
Two moments on every case are worth more than all the others for managing your time: the first meeting (when you decide what kind of support this person needs) and the last (how you close, or don't). Get these two right and the whole case runs smoother. Most people rush the first and treat the last as paperwork. Both are mistakes.
The first meeting — sort fast, don't over-assess
Your job in the first meeting or two isn't to solve everything — it's to figure out which tier this client belongs in (Module 3) so you can give them the right rhythm from day one. A few quick questions usually tell you: How long since they last worked? What's actually standing between them and a job? How much do they already know how to do on their own? You're listening for whether this is someone who needs you intensively, regularly, or lightly.
The last meeting — closing is not just paperwork
Here's a finding that should change how you close cases. Research following vocational-rehab clients for years afterward found that people who got services but left without a job did worse, long-term, than people who never got services at all. An unsuccessful close isn't a neutral "well, we tried." It's a moment where a client is at real risk of sliding backward — and it's exactly when a small, deliberate hand-off matters most.
"A client leaving without a job is a warning light, not a closed file. It's the moment to set up what happens next — not to make a clean break." — drawn from vocational-rehab outcome research
So treat every closure as a quick triage:
- Left with a job? Set a 30/60/90-day check-in so a wobble doesn't become a lost job. Note who the employer contact is.
- Left without a job? Don't just close. What specifically stopped them? Is there a peer, a group, an alumni connection, or another program you can warm-hand-off to? And write the exit note well enough that the next worker — here or elsewhere — starts ahead, not from scratch.
There's a one-page closing checklist in Your Toolkit.
Think about it
A Weekly Rhythm You Can Keep
~9 min read · Stop letting the loudest client run your week
You've sorted your caseload by tier. Now you need a week that protects the right time for the right people — because without a plan, your week gets decided for you. The phone rings, the anxious client emails three times, a crisis lands, and suddenly it's Thursday and you haven't touched your highest-need clients who didn't happen to shout this week. A weekly rhythm is how you take the steering wheel back.
The default rule, named
If you don't choose a rule for who gets your time, a rule still runs your week by default: "whoever contacted me most recently." That's the squeaky-wheel rule, and it's almost never the one you'd pick on purpose — because the loudest client is rarely the highest-need one. The fix isn't working more hours. It's deciding your priorities before the week starts, so the urgent-but-minor stuff doesn't crowd out the important stuff.
- Protect Tier 1 time first. Block it before anything else can fill the slot.
- Tolerate gaps with Tier 3 — on purpose. A low-need client going three weeks without a call is the plan working, not failing.
- Batch the reactive stuff. Set windows for returning calls and messages instead of letting them interrupt all day.
A starter weekly shape
| When | Focus |
|---|---|
| Monday | Protected Tier 1 time — your highest-need clients, while your energy's freshest. Plus planning the week. |
| Tuesday | Tier 2 contacts; group sessions if you run them. |
| Wednesday AM | New intakes & closures — sort new clients (Module 6), review anyone exiting this week. |
| Wednesday PM | Tier 2 contacts; employer outreach. |
| Thursday | Groups; quick Tier 3 check-ins; respond to the week's messages in a batch. |
| Friday | Paperwork catch-up; a short team huddle or peer check-in; 15 minutes to reset for next week. |
Don't copy this exactly — build your own version around your real commitments. The point isn't the grid; it's that Tier 1 time and your intake/closure block are protected before the reactive stuff can eat them. The full template is in Your Toolkit.
Think about it
Cut Your Paperwork
~6 min read · Win back the hours you don't spend with clients
Documentation is the quiet caseload-killer. Two counsellors can carry the same number of clients and have completely different workloads, because one spends 30 minutes a week per client on notes and reporting and the other spends 15. Admin time is a real, movable part of your load — not a fixed cost you just have to absorb. This is a short module because the move is simple: find out where your admin time actually goes, then cut or speed up the worst offenders.
First, see it
Most people have no idea how many hours a week go to paperwork versus clients — it just feels like "too much." For one week, jot a rough tally: time with clients vs. time on notes, reports, and data entry. You don't need a stopwatch; ballpark is fine. Almost everyone is surprised, and the surprise is the point — you can't cut what you can't see.
Then, cut
- Write the note during or right after the meeting, not at the end of the day. Reconstructing six meetings on Friday afternoon takes far longer than capturing each one while it's fresh — and the notes are better.
- Build templates and reusable snippets for the case notes you write over and over. A good template turns a blank page into a fill-in-the-blanks.
- Stop entering the same thing twice. If you're copying information between two systems or forms, flag it — duplicate entry is pure waste and your manager may be able to fix it.
- Ask what's actually required vs. habit. Some of what we document is genuinely needed; some is a report no one reads or a field that's optional. Find out which.
- Keep a "good enough" bar. Notes need to be accurate and useful to the next person — they don't need to be beautiful. Don't gold-plate.
Think about it
Don't Carry It Alone
~7 min read · Your caseload doesn't have to be yours alone
One of the deepest habits in this work is treating your caseload as yours — your clients, your responsibility, your problem to carry. It feels professional. It's also one of the fastest roads to burnout, and it's not how the best-performing teams operate. The most effective employment programs in the world treat caseload as a team property: the team shares job leads, covers each other's clients, and no one carries their hardest cases entirely alone.
What "shared" looks like in practice
You don't need to redesign your whole team to get some of this benefit. Even informally, you can:
- Have a go-to backup. Pair up with one colleague as each other's "if I'm out or slammed, you can step in" person — and actually brief each other on a couple of high-need clients so the coverage is real, not theoretical.
- Bring a stuck case to the team. A short, regular "here's a client I'm stuck on, what would you try?" with colleagues spreads good ideas and reminds you you're not the only brain on the problem.
- Share employer leads. If you've got a warm employer contact and a colleague has a client who fits better, trade. A job filled is a win whoever's caseload it lands on.
- Ask for backup before you're underwater, not after. "Can you cover my Tier 1 check-ins Thursday, I'm slammed" is a normal professional request, not an admission of failure.
"Caseload is a team property, not a private burden. The strongest programs build in mutual coverage — nobody carries their hardest cases entirely alone." — drawn from supported-employment (IPS) team practice
Peers and other helpers
You're also not the only support your client has. Peer mentors (people who've been through unemployment, disability, or newcomer settlement themselves), community programs, and group sessions can carry real weight that doesn't all have to come from you. Knowing your referral network well — and using it — is a legitimate way to lighten a caseload while serving the client better.
Think about it
Buy Back Time With Groups
~7 min read · Serve more people in the same hour
Some of what you deliver one-on-one doesn't have to be. Résumé basics, interview prep, job-search strategy, understanding the local labour market — these are things a roomful of clients can learn together, in one hour of your time instead of eight. Done well, a group isn't a watered-down service; it's often a better one, because clients get something they can't get from you alone: each other.
Two reasons groups work
- They multiply your time. One hour of prep and delivery reaches eight or ten people. On a heavy caseload, that math is hard to argue with.
- They add peer power. Clients normalize each other's setbacks, share leads, swap what worked, and hold each other accountable in a way that lands differently than advice from staff. The group becomes a support system that keeps working between your contacts.
What works as a group — and what doesn't
Good fit for groups
- Résumé and cover-letter basics
- Interview practice (clients role-play for each other)
- Job-search strategy and routines
- Labour-market and sector info sessions
- Peer support / accountability check-ins
Keep one-on-one
- Sensitive personal barriers and disclosures
- Crisis support
- Individual employer matching and negotiation
- Anything a client wouldn't want said in a room
Make it a cohort, not just a room
The biggest mistake is running a "group" that's really just several people doing individual work in the same space. The value comes from interaction — clients talking to each other, not just to you. Build in introductions, small-group exercises, and a reason to come back and report progress to the group. A cohort that moves through a few sessions together builds the peer accountability that does the heavy lifting.
Think about it
Protect Yourself From Burnout
~9 min read · You can't pour from an empty cup
A heavy caseload doesn't just risk your clients' outcomes — it risks you. Burnout is real, it's common in this work, and it's not a character flaw or a sign you're not cut out for it. It's what happens to caring people under sustained overload. This module is about spotting it early and protecting yourself, because a burned-out counsellor helps no one — and the research is clear that when workers burn out, the quality of what clients receive drops too.
What burnout actually looks like
It's more than being tired. Watch for these creeping in over weeks, not just a bad day:
- Exhaustion — emotionally drained by the end of most days, not refilling on time off.
- Feeling ineffective — "I'm not making a difference," even when you objectively are.
- Going numb toward clients — caring less than you used to, getting cynical or short.
- Work bleeding into life — can't switch off, sleep's off, the job follows you home in a way that isn't sustainable.
There's a short, private self-check in Your Toolkit built around these. It's not a diagnosis — it's an early-warning light.
"When the work environment grinds workers down, burnout follows — and burnout directly lowers the quality of service clients receive. Protecting yourself is protecting them." — drawn from research on vocational-rehab counsellors
What actually protects you
Not bubble baths and gratitude journals — useful as those might be, the evidence points at sturdier things, and most of them are in this course:
- Good supervision and support. The single most reliable protector across every sector studied. If you have access to a supervisor or a peer-support routine, use it — and ask for it if you don't.
- Not carrying it alone (Module 9). Team coverage and shared cases reduce stress, even at the same caseload size.
- Structure that fits the load (Modules 3, 7). Tiering and a protected weekly rhythm don't just help clients — they measurably reduce the feeling of chaos that drives burnout.
- Real boundaries. A defined end to the day, actual breaks, time off you actually take. Modeling sustainable work isn't slacking; it's what lets you stay in this job for years.
Think about it
Your Personal Caseload Playbook
~8 min read · Putting it together — and knowing when to flag it up
You've got the pieces. This module assembles them into a simple playbook you can actually run — and it's honest about the line where your job ends and your manager's begins.
Your five-move playbook
- Sort your caseload into tiers (Module 3) — and keep it current.
- Match your effort to the tier (Modules 2 & 4) — intensity where it counts, lighter touch where it doesn't, without the guilt.
- Make every contact count (Module 5) — quality over quantity; every meeting ends with a concrete next step.
- Run a protected weekly rhythm (Module 7) — Tier 1 time and your intake/closure block defended before the reactive stuff lands.
- Don't carry it alone (Modules 9 & 10) — backup, peers, groups, referrals.
And underneath it all, two things you keep an eye on: your paperwork time (Module 8) and your own wellbeing (Module 11).
Knowing when it's bigger than you
Here's the honest part. Everything in this course helps a heavy caseload land better. None of it shrinks the caseload. There's a point where the load is simply past what any practice can absorb — where you've tiered, protected your week, asked for backup, and you're still leaving high-need clients unserved and running on empty. When you hit that point, the right move isn't more self-management. It's telling your manager — clearly, and with specifics. That's not complaining. It's doing your job responsibly.
How to raise it well
Managers respond better to specifics than to "I'm drowning." Bring:
- The number. "I'm carrying X clients, of which roughly Y are high-need."
- What you've already done. "I've tiered the caseload, I'm protecting Tier 1 time, I've set up backup with a colleague." This shows you've worked the part that's yours.
- The concrete cost. "Even so, I can't get to my Tier 1 clients more than once a month, and three closed without a job last month with no warm hand-off because there wasn't time."
- A specific ask. Not just "help" — something like "can we look at coverage for the highest-need group, or where some of these could be redistributed?"
Think about it
Knowledge Check
~6 min · A quick self-test
1. Your caseload feels impossible to keep up with. The course's starting point is:
2. The single most important idea in this course is:
3. Giving intensive, high-touch support to a low-need, nearly job-ready client can:
4. When you sort your caseload into tiers, a tier is best understood as:
5. Giving a job-ready client a lighter touch is best described as:
6. "Make every contact count" is based on the finding that:
7. A strong client contact usually ends with:
8. A client is leaving your service without a job. The research suggests you should:
9. If you don't choose a rule for who gets your time each week, the rule that runs by default is:
10. The course's stance on your caseload being "yours alone" is:
11. If you've tiered your caseload, protected your week, and asked for backup but are still burning out month after month, it most likely means:
12. The best way to raise an unmanageable caseload with your manager is:
Last reflection
- Which single module will change something on your caseload this week?
- What's the one habit this course pushed back on hardest — and what will you do differently?
Your Toolkit
Reference · Grab-and-go worksheets, checklists & scripts
Seven ready-to-use tools that go with the modules. Adapt them to how you actually work — they're starting points, not rules.
1 — Tier-Sort Worksheet
Goes with Module 3. Put a 1, 2, or 3 beside every client. Use your judgement; aim for done, not perfect.
| Tier | This client if… | Their rhythm with you |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — High | Multiple barriers, far from job-ready, or in crisis | Frequent, intensive contact |
| 2 — Medium | Some barriers, progressing with regular support | Regular, lighter contact |
| 3 — Low | Near job-ready, self-directed | Periodic check-ins; fast response when they reach out |
After sorting, ask: Does the shape look right? Any Tier 3 clients getting Tier 1 time? Any Tier 1 clients I'm not seeing enough?
2 — The 6-Point Contact Checklist
Goes with Module 5. Not every contact needs all six — but a contact with none of them probably didn't need to be a meeting.
- ☐ A genuine relationship moment (warmth, respect)
- ☐ Practised one concrete skill or step together
- ☐ Client leaves with one specific next action they own
- ☐ Named and reinforced something they did well
- ☐ Got under the surface to the real barrier and worked on it
- ☐ Modelled / rehearsed something before they do it for real
3 — Closing-a-Case Checklist
Goes with Module 6. Closing is a triage moment, not just filing.
Left with a job?
- ☐ 30/60/90-day check-in scheduled
- ☐ Employer contact noted for follow-up
Left without a job?
- ☐ Named the specific barrier that stopped them
- ☐ Made a warm hand-off (peer, group, alumni, another program) where possible
- ☐ Wrote an exit note good enough that the next worker starts ahead, not from scratch
4 — Weekly Rhythm Template
Goes with Module 7. Build your own around real commitments. The non-negotiables: protected Tier 1 time, and a set intake/closure block.
| When | Focus |
|---|---|
| Monday | Protected Tier 1 time + week planning |
| Tuesday | Tier 2 contacts; groups |
| Wed AM | New intakes & closures (the triage block) |
| Wed PM | Tier 2 contacts; employer outreach |
| Thursday | Groups; Tier 3 check-ins; batch messages |
| Friday | Paperwork; team huddle/peer check-in; 15-min reset |
5 — The "Doing Less, On Purpose" Script
Goes with Module 4. For telling a job-ready client you're moving to a lighter touch — framed as confidence, not a cutback.
"Honestly, you're in a really strong spot — you've got the skills and you're doing the work. So instead of weekly meetings, I'm going to check in every few weeks and let you run with it. You can reach me anytime in between, and if anything changes or you hit a wall, just flag me and we'll jump back in. Sound okay?"
6 — Asking-for-Backup Script
Goes with Module 9. For setting up mutual coverage with a colleague — a normal professional ask.
"Can we be each other's backup? If I'm out or slammed, you could step in for my highest-need folks and I'd do the same for you. Want to swap quick notes on two or three clients each so it's real coverage, not starting cold?"
7 — Burnout Self-Check
Goes with Module 11. Not a diagnosis — an early-warning light. Rate yourself 1 (rarely) to 5 (almost always) over the past two weeks:
- I feel emotionally drained at the end of my workday. ___
- I feel like I'm not making a difference for my clients. ___
- I'm finding it hard to care as much as I used to. ___
- My work is following me home in a way that isn't sustainable. ___
- The way my work is set up makes it hard to do it well. ___